Digital Reactive
05-15-2004, 04:47 PM
In the debate which is related to the digital music which was opened at the American university, representation and P2P industry of music industry have a heated discussion. Those where among those especially support is obtained in were of the flat tire band fugazi which stands "3rd point of view".
Around ahead in the debate which is related to the digital music which is held at the American university, protected the file exchange sight, as for staff of music industry active argument was exchanged hundreds human thing students before e.g., dissenting opinion of the popularity wrapper is introduced.
As for at this event those which communication department of the same university sponsors. The participants exchanged various opinions concerning the influence of the P2P sight which the time is utilized even in transmission of copyright equipped music.
As for the artist anyhow, as for the writing the lyric composer......
All-American record associations (RIAA) as for the government public relations charge vice president strike foehn person, "as for those where it is most important, it is the point where the writing the lyric composer is made desertion. As for everyone, as for the artist it seems that you think that the money can be made with tour,, but the writing the lyric composer does not do tour ", that it pointed out. RIAA has carried out the attitude which is opposite to the joint ownership of digital music firmly, assuming, that copyright equipped music is used non- just, already it appeals hundreds human thing users, (article reference March 24th).
On the one hand, you insisted that the executive director of P2P United which, is the economic organization of file exchange service enterprise, as for Adam, as for the P2P sight it introduces the new band in the consumer, before the purchasing music it has contributed to the sale of music industry by the fact that the audition that it tries it is possible.
Furthermore economic organization Distributed Computing Industry Association (DCIA) CEO (the highest management patsy), necessity of the match which is directed to the amendment of current Copyright Act was appealed. In addition the same person urged that for the eye, the point of compromise of the digital music fan which desires file sharing is found in new technology, vis-a-vis music industry.
As for, as for the notion that where also everyone understands "the video deck after all, did not come to the point of burying movie industry. As for industry it is necessary to learn the technique which utilizes IT technology ", you said. The same person utilizes new technology vis-a-vis record industry, as a business consists, that what like cartel the royalty collection system will not apply is invented you proposed.
On the one hand, the strike foehn person file sharing repeated the insistence that harmfulness for music industry, that of serious characteristic of thing is thought, appealed to the students.
"The testimony which LL COOL J did in the Upper House public hearing being able to say, was strange. ' Stealing the necklace I from Tiffany, when you received from Tiffany, when you spoke to everyone, you rejoiced Tiffany or, that ' he said ", that the strike foehn person.
As for gaining the support of the meeting place
Argument incandesced, as for the speakers without the margin of the respective compromise developed insistence. While such as that, the fact that heart of the audience is caught, about 30 minutes doing from start of argument, is the speech which of flat tire band Fugazi of legend did.
"Every one and this, the just argument which is widely different from music. As for me here Washington D.C. Because so you were brought up, you have known well bureaucratic principle which extent inveterate ones. We would like to do what, if is, you ask, it is not to be, the, there is only doing. Because always answering is the no, with began to talk to the audience.
Furthermore looked back at the history regarding the distribution of music simply. "Music for a long time exists from word. At one time the people had gone out outside in order to inquire about the performance of music. When fee is paid, if it is, when it is not paid, it was. And, the epoch-making technology that was invented in the change eye of century you record music. And directly, the market of such music was born, after that business in order to make money in such market established. It is not possible to pick up music from the people. Because music it spreads in the sky, ", when with speaks, from the audience many Š… cases it arosed.
On the one hand, as for the other members of debate, as for insistence it points out that they are exceptional ones, as an artist.
The American movie association which causes infringement of copyright lawsuit (MPAA) as for the public information person in charge rich tailor person "as for it selected. He lowered the selection that it offers music to Internet. But is a right to raise living in the artist ", you say.
Argument continues talked as follows after the debate, concerning his own standpoint.
"Have managed I the record label. Salary was paid to everyone of the band, the member of the band everyone, bought also the house. I have raised living with music ",
American university 2nd grade plate van, says that insistence most remained in impression.
"The problem where such law is entwined is tend to become the both poles edge, but brought 3rd point of view there. There was hearing answer. My myself opinion exactly is about center. It is the expectation which is even record industry itself while it is expecting the arrival of IT technology, sows the responsibility of this problem, already and cannot utilize. If under the license of the record company, the convenient service like iTunes is recognized, problem about now has not become serious ", that, you talked. Music industry is advancing lawsuit, but that then it probably does not mean to solve this problem, she said and attached.
Around ahead in the debate which is related to the digital music which is held at the American university, protected the file exchange sight, as for staff of music industry active argument was exchanged hundreds human thing students before e.g., dissenting opinion of the popularity wrapper is introduced.
As for at this event those which communication department of the same university sponsors. The participants exchanged various opinions concerning the influence of the P2P sight which the time is utilized even in transmission of copyright equipped music.
As for the artist anyhow, as for the writing the lyric composer......
All-American record associations (RIAA) as for the government public relations charge vice president strike foehn person, "as for those where it is most important, it is the point where the writing the lyric composer is made desertion. As for everyone, as for the artist it seems that you think that the money can be made with tour,, but the writing the lyric composer does not do tour ", that it pointed out. RIAA has carried out the attitude which is opposite to the joint ownership of digital music firmly, assuming, that copyright equipped music is used non- just, already it appeals hundreds human thing users, (article reference March 24th).
On the one hand, you insisted that the executive director of P2P United which, is the economic organization of file exchange service enterprise, as for Adam, as for the P2P sight it introduces the new band in the consumer, before the purchasing music it has contributed to the sale of music industry by the fact that the audition that it tries it is possible.
Furthermore economic organization Distributed Computing Industry Association (DCIA) CEO (the highest management patsy), necessity of the match which is directed to the amendment of current Copyright Act was appealed. In addition the same person urged that for the eye, the point of compromise of the digital music fan which desires file sharing is found in new technology, vis-a-vis music industry.
As for, as for the notion that where also everyone understands "the video deck after all, did not come to the point of burying movie industry. As for industry it is necessary to learn the technique which utilizes IT technology ", you said. The same person utilizes new technology vis-a-vis record industry, as a business consists, that what like cartel the royalty collection system will not apply is invented you proposed.
On the one hand, the strike foehn person file sharing repeated the insistence that harmfulness for music industry, that of serious characteristic of thing is thought, appealed to the students.
"The testimony which LL COOL J did in the Upper House public hearing being able to say, was strange. ' Stealing the necklace I from Tiffany, when you received from Tiffany, when you spoke to everyone, you rejoiced Tiffany or, that ' he said ", that the strike foehn person.
As for gaining the support of the meeting place
Argument incandesced, as for the speakers without the margin of the respective compromise developed insistence. While such as that, the fact that heart of the audience is caught, about 30 minutes doing from start of argument, is the speech which of flat tire band Fugazi of legend did.
"Every one and this, the just argument which is widely different from music. As for me here Washington D.C. Because so you were brought up, you have known well bureaucratic principle which extent inveterate ones. We would like to do what, if is, you ask, it is not to be, the, there is only doing. Because always answering is the no, with began to talk to the audience.
Furthermore looked back at the history regarding the distribution of music simply. "Music for a long time exists from word. At one time the people had gone out outside in order to inquire about the performance of music. When fee is paid, if it is, when it is not paid, it was. And, the epoch-making technology that was invented in the change eye of century you record music. And directly, the market of such music was born, after that business in order to make money in such market established. It is not possible to pick up music from the people. Because music it spreads in the sky, ", when with speaks, from the audience many Š… cases it arosed.
On the one hand, as for the other members of debate, as for insistence it points out that they are exceptional ones, as an artist.
The American movie association which causes infringement of copyright lawsuit (MPAA) as for the public information person in charge rich tailor person "as for it selected. He lowered the selection that it offers music to Internet. But is a right to raise living in the artist ", you say.
Argument continues talked as follows after the debate, concerning his own standpoint.
"Have managed I the record label. Salary was paid to everyone of the band, the member of the band everyone, bought also the house. I have raised living with music ",
American university 2nd grade plate van, says that insistence most remained in impression.
"The problem where such law is entwined is tend to become the both poles edge, but brought 3rd point of view there. There was hearing answer. My myself opinion exactly is about center. It is the expectation which is even record industry itself while it is expecting the arrival of IT technology, sows the responsibility of this problem, already and cannot utilize. If under the license of the record company, the convenient service like iTunes is recognized, problem about now has not become serious ", that, you talked. Music industry is advancing lawsuit, but that then it probably does not mean to solve this problem, she said and attached.